Jump to content

Year 1 Sem 2/LC Introduction to Particle Physics and Cosmology/Lecture 03

From Ash's Lecture Notes

Lecture 3: Particle Physics III: Particle/Matter Interactions
Thu 05 Feb 2026 16:00

← Previous lecture · Module · Next lecture →

In order to look at specific detectors and how they work, we need to consider how particles interact with matter. We’ll consider categories of particles and their standard interactions, and use this to build a model for how we can build a detector.

We’ve looked at this previously:

For example:

  • Charged particles produce ionisation in the non-destructive tracking system, leaving deposits we can detect as signal.
  • Electrons and photons leave distinctive signatures (shape of the shower of particles) in the electromagnetic calorimeters.
  • Hadrons leave deposits in the electromagnetic calorimeter, but they dump all their energy (and are mostly identifiable by) the hadronic calorimeter.
  • Muons make it through all of the previous layers, and are picked up at the very end by the outermost muon system.

Charged Particles

Ionisation

This is the process that powers the tracking system. A charged particle, $h$ comes into the system (it could be a hadron or a lepton). It exchanges a photon with an electron in the system and excites the electron, ejecting it from the atom.

Strictly:

We can to try to characterise the rate of energy loss of the charged particle. The average rate of energy loss per unit distance is:

$$-\left\langle \frac{dE}{dl}\right\rangle \propto \ln E$$

Where $E$ is energy, and the sign is negative as energy is being lost here.

For example, a real detector here might be two charged plates with a high voltage sandwiching a gas mixture. As the gas mixture is ionised, the ionised portion drifts towards one of the electrodes where it induces a detectable current.

Bremsstrahlung

Translates to “braking radiation”. Consider a free electron radiating a photon. This is impossible for a free particle (as if we consider the electron’s rest frame, emission would violate conservation of energy). We therefore need a source of external interference, in this case matter.

An electron is accelerated by nuclear change as it passes through material and is scattered. This scattering causes bremsstrahlung photon emission. The average rate of energy loss is given by:

$$- \left< \frac{dE}{dx} \right> \propto \frac{E}{m^2} \propto \frac{E}{X_0}$$

An electron will then generate more bremsstrahlung than a muon, due to its much smaller mass. $X_0$ is called radiation length, and is covered in future lectures.

Cherenkov Radiation

Consider a charged particle moving through a (non-vacuum) material. It emits photons at some angle $\theta_c$ if the particle is moving faster than the speed of light in the medium (note this does not violate relativity, as the speed of light in a medium is less than the speed of light in a vacuum).

These emitted photons cause a coherent wavefront to form around the particle’s trajectory, forming a cone around the direction of travel. The angle $\theta_c$ is given by:

Geometrically, after time $t$, the emitted photon has travelled $ct/n$ and the particle $vt$, hence:

$$\cos \theta_c = \frac{ct/n}{vt} = \frac{c}{nv} = \frac{1}{n \beta}$$

Where $n$ is the refractive index of the material. This is analogous to shock waves forming when an object goes faster than the speed of sound.

A planar detector will take a single cross-section through this cone, detecting rings around the point the charged particle passed through the material. By measuring this ring, we can work out the speed of the particle, and use this along with a measured momentum (in a tracking detector) to work out the mass of the particle.

Again:

$$- \left< \frac{dE}{dx} \right> \propto z^2 \sin^2 \theta_c$$

Where $z$ is the particle charge in units of $|e|$. It is important to note that this is a very small energy loss for the particle. It may emit $10^3 \gamma / \mathrm{cm}$, and only lose a few $\mathrm{keV} / \mathrm{cm}$

Photons

Photoelectric Effect

We have a photon strike a atom, transferring energy and forcing an electron to be ejected. The max kinetic energy of the electron is given by the photon energy minus some amount of work to eject it:

$$E_{kmax} = hf - \phi$$

Where $\phi$, the work function, is the energy required to liberate one electron from the atom’s surface.

Compton Scattering

See QM1. A photon scatters off a quasi-free electron in an atom. The photon and electron are scattered with a change in energy:

$$\gamma + e^- \to \gamma^\prime + e^{- \prime}$$

Thomson scattering is a low-energy form of scattering where the energies do not change, and Rayleigh scattering is a very low energy limit, where the interaction takes place between a photon and multiple atomic electrons.

Pair Production

A photon interacting with a nucleus can (leaving the nucleus unscathed) produce a particle and the corresponding antiparticle, typically a positron and an electron. This has a minimum photon energy of $E_\gamma > 2m_e c^2$1 to ensure conservation of energy isn’t violated and must occur in the presence of matter (for the same reason as Bremsstrahlung). The photon is not present in the final state.

However, say a photon has precisely the energy required to create a pair. This would (as it stands) create a pair of electrons with zero momentum (or very small momentum). However, a photon always has a momentum given by its energy, so momentum is not conserved. If the pair travel to attempt to resolve this, they now have some kinetic energy too, which means the photon must have a higher energy, and hence a higher momentum. This creates mismatch, we cannot conserve both energy and momentum in this situation.

By this interaction taking place in the presence of a nucleus, the nucleus can absorb some recoil (via exchange of a virtual photon) to ensure conservation of energy and momentum are satisfied.

This must take place in a Coulomb field to contribute this photon. The present nucleus has charge $z|e|$.

Lets consider the cross section of this interaction:

$$\sigma_\text{pprod} \propto \frac{7}{9}\frac{A}{N_A} \frac{1}{X_0}$$

$X_0$ is the radiation length. It is a complex property of the material but is proportional to $1/z^2$.

Neutrinos

Neutrinos are really difficult to detect, as they are only effected by the weak interaction and have no ionisation/pair production etc - they are effectively non-interacting. We detect them by detecting the products of a weak force interaction.

For example:

  • A muon neutrino can exchange a $W$ boson with a proton, which becomes a neutron. The muon neutrino becomes a muon and the up quark in the proton becomes a down quark in the neutron.
    • We can detect the muon that’s produced as the neutrino passes through the detector and interacts.
    • We build a massive multi-tonne detector that puts a large amount of mass in the way of the neutrino, often water.
    • We do this in the hope that it will interact with some of the matter and produce the more-detectable muon.
  • The neutrino can scatter off a nucleus.
    • A mall amount of energy is exchanged with the nucleus, depositing a small amount of heat energy in the detector’s matter.
    • Nothing changes/decays/is produced etc other than a small amount of heat.
    • We build a very sensitive detector capable of detecting this very small amount of heat.

Hadrons

Hadrons are really complex in their interactions. They can have inelastic nuclear interactions, with large energy deposits at a small number of sites (compared to an ECal shower where we’d expect to see many smaller deposits). This arises as a result of the nucleus becoming excited or breaking apart entirely and producing a chain of secondary hadrons/particles and a change in the nucleus.

These secondary particles can go on to interact again. This are complex and messy objects which can fragment off to cause many secondary impacts.

Conclusion

In summary:

  • The key interactions we care about are ionisation, Bremsstrahlung and Cherenkov radiation for charged particles.
  • For photons, we care about pair production.
  • For hadrons, hadron showers are messy and complex. We add inelastic nuclear interactions on top of an electromagnetic component from ionisation and everything becomes rather tricky.

Footnotes

1.

$m_ec^2 = 0.511 \mathrm{MeV}$


← Previous lecture · Module · Next lecture →